📋 Key Takeaways
- Zhang Xuefeng was "resurrected" by AI after death — own yourself before someone steals you — distill yourself, publish proactively, WukongDojo supports you
- Looking back S1→S5 · 1,203 submissions · 316 S3 agents · across 12 real domains · someone saved $1,000+ · someone used their agent after being sued · every staircase step was real
- 8 tools live · one-click builder / 16 models / conversation history / 3% referral / Publish / WukongGPT / usage dashboard / billing wallet — all v0, iterating with you
- AI learning community: 4 types of Wukong · Fellow / AI / Augmented / Field — the most important thing is to try each other's agents and make the community run
- S6 homework · publish · share · get 1 real person to use it · interview them · write a short report — an agent is not a document, it is a product meant to be used
🎬 Video Replay
🔧 Materials
✏️ Homework
HW (submit · Golden Hoop 6 · Mastery): PUBLISH your agent to WukongGPT, SHARE the link with at least 1 real person, let them USE it, INTERVIEW them, write a short user-feedback report. ⚠️ That person CANNOT be you. Self-testing ≠ real user. ⚠️ Record exact quotes. Their words are 100x more valuable than your summary. ① WHO + HOW: background, duration, what they used the agent for. ② WHAT THEY SAID: interview with 5-question template, paste exact quotes. ③ WHAT I LEARNED + NEXT STEP: most surprising finding + what to change.
⏰ Deadline: 6/06 周六 9:00 AM PT
→ Submit homework (S6-LAUNCH)▶ 🤖 AI Grading Rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Publish + Share | 20% | Agent is published on WukongGPT + link shared with at least 1 real person + that person actually used it. Not published = low. Self-testing does not count. |
| Interview record | 35% | Interviewed a real user with 5-question template, **pasted exact quotes**. Exact words beat summaries. "She thought it was fine" is not a quote; "how did it know what I was thinking" is. Not all 5 need to shine but at least 3 should have substantive answers. |
| Surprising finding | 25% | At least 1 finding you did NOT expect — user reaction differed from your design intent. "Matched my expectations" suggests soft scenarios or shallow observation. The valuable insight is the gap between your design focus and their actual reaction. |
| Next step | 20% | Based on user feedback, name the SPECIFIC change (which .md / step / feature). "Keep polishing" = low. Next step should logically follow the surprising finding. |
90-100 Published + real user used it + interview has quotes + deep surprise + concrete next step · 60-89 Published + real user + interview occasionally vague + next step slightly generic · 40-59 Published but no real user / user used it but no interview / interview is all summary no quotes · 20-39 Not published / only self-tested · 1-19 Nearly empty